Fall 2022 Winners

After receiving numerous excellent submissions, the HULR is excited to announce our Fall 2022 Essay Contest Winners. We thank all applicants for their enthusiasm and commitment to participating in our contest, as well as all the teachers who helped spread the word about us and encouraged their students to apply.

Award winners are offered a book of their choice as well as a diploma. All winning submissions can be viewed below.

1st Place

Andrew Jin, Deterring Gray-Zone Cyberwar: A Legal Critique

2nd Place

Ashwin Telang, Lawyerless Justice: Stagnating the Development of Law and Dismantling Civil Rights

3rd Place

Kriya Shah, How India Fails its Future

2022 Essay Contest Theme

The theme for the HULR’s Fall 2022 Essay Contest is “Keeping up with the Times.” In recent decades, governments and the law have been criticized for failing to adapt to a world that is changing much faster than them. How can a relatively static institution like the law keep up with an ever-changing world? You are encouraged to discuss any areas of the law in which you believe legal institutions have not been dynamic enough to provide an adequate structure for the problems they face. To substantiate your claims, you may discuss the legal system(s) of any nation, state, or locality with which you are familiar.

Kriya Shah Kriya Shah

How India Fails Its Future

Lawyers are the most dynamic and critical component of America’s justice system. As the enforcer of constitutional rights, a lawyer assumes far-reaching levels of importance in daily life. Law has no meaning without lawyers. When Congress is slow to act, attorneys respond to national changes swiftly by protecting their clients. They ensure that growing threats to democracy, economic liberty, and basic rights are immediately put to rest. However, today’s lawyers are almost entirely exclusive to the elite. The cost of lawyers has ballooned by over 41% since 1986. As a result, a staggering 92% of low-income Americans do not have access to civil lawyers. This drives a dangerous phenomenon—lawyerless justice—where poor, uneducated Americans are ambushed by wealthy, well-versed lawyers.

Read More
Ashwin Telang Ashwin Telang

Lawyerless Justice: Stagnating the Development of Law and Dismantling Civil Rights

Lawyers are the most dynamic and critical component of America’s justice system. As the enforcer of constitutional rights, a lawyer assumes far-reaching levels of importance in daily life. Law has no meaning without lawyers. When Congress is slow to act, attorneys respond to national changes swiftly by protecting their clients. They ensure that growing threats to democracy, economic liberty, and basic rights are immediately put to rest. However, today’s lawyers are almost entirely exclusive to the elite. The cost of lawyers has ballooned by over 41% since 1986. As a result, a staggering 92% of low-income Americans do not have access to civil lawyers. This drives a dangerous phenomenon—lawyerless justice—where poor, uneducated Americans are ambushed by wealthy, well-versed lawyers.

Read More
Andrew Jin Andrew Jin

Deterring Gray-Zone Cyberwar: A Legal Critique

The advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has heralded a new era of strategic competition,where wars are increasingly waged in cyberspace and below the threshold of armed conflict. United States law, however, has only slowly adapted, ex post facto, to the onslaught of hybrid and gray-zone cyberattacks, relying instead on conventional cost imposition and a strategy of “persistent engagement” that cedes initiative to the attacker by emphasizing defense over deterrence. Our faith in existing domestic and international laws to adequately dissuade cybercriminal activity has left stretching loopholes in juridical processes determining the threshold for retaliation. Consequently, cyberattacks are occurring at an alarming frequency because adversarial states progressively view them as a low-cost option to achieve national objectives; in the past two years alone, over forty major cyber incidents targeted the United States, many of which were intended to disrupt the democratic lifeblood of our country: the electoral process.

Read More